Legal Helps
Home     Legal Advice   Legal Aid   Legal Aid Seniors   legal assistance   legal advice divorce   legal advice bankruptcy   legal advice disclaimer   legal advice employment   real estate legal advice   legal advice family law   free legal advice online   All Tags
Home ›› Legal Aid ›› No win, no fee to end?
   
 You may find:
criminal legal aid court ; legal aid criminal record ; Free Legal Services in Georgia ; criminal aid legal assistance ; criminal Legal Aid Services ; criminal aid legal representation
 Popular Tags:
legal eligibility Aid Calculator | aid eligibility Legal assistance | legal aid eligibility spouse | aid eligibility Legal Files | criminal legal aid fees | mutual legal assistance treaties | Social Security Disability | legal aid lawyer | Free Legal Assistance Online | Fathers Rights in Child Support
No win, no fee to end?

Tag:criminal legal aid fees criminal legal aid | 44 Viewers| legalactiongroupnews 2009-06-23 20:10:28 Publish:

Much of the legal press picked up on the Conservative Shadow Justice Secretary Dominic Grieve’s comment at LAG’s ‘Legal aid at 60: bridging the justice gap’ conference earlier this month that if elected next May the Conservative party would decide to roll out best value tendering for police station and magistrates’ court work or ‘abandon it completely’. Less well reported were his comments on no-win, no-fee arrangements (NWNFA).

Grieve admitted that the Conservatives had first permitted such arrangements, but said that Labour’s Access to Justice Act 1999, which replaced personal injury in legal aid with no win, no fee ‘seriously went off the rails’. In a response to a question from solicitor Simon Foster about what the Conservatives would do about NWNFA if elected, Grieve said, ‘If I could see a way of removing no-win, no-fee agreements and introducing a contingency fund I would do it. I believe no win, no fee is a flawed system which has a gentle corrupting influence on the legal profession’.

In the last ten years there has been a large growth in personal injury cases funded in this way and to an extent they have succeeded in allowing many people who otherwise could not afford it to pursue their claims; but at a cost. Unregulated claims assessors were siphoning up to 20 per cent of a client’s compensation and there has been much complaint about shoddy work. The courts eventually ruled on the issue of the amounts the claims companies could charge and claims management regulation came into force in April 2007.

While it would seem then that the problems with claims companies have been largely resolved, the point remains that lawyers have a stake in the outcome of cases, leaving many clients without representation as their cases have merit but are either too complex or too risky to take on. Clients also might be advised to take settlements as lawyers do not want to risk losing in court. Grieve’s solution is a contingent legal aid fund (CLAF) and this is supported by the Bar Council and Citizens Advice, among others. Such a fund would be paid for by charging application fees and taking a percentage from the winnings in successful cases.

LAG has warned that such a system could not co-exist with NWNFA, as lawyers would cream off the better cases leaving those with less chance of success for the CLAF. It would seem Grieve believes this as well. The question is if he takes the reins of power next year at the Ministry of Justice does he have the determination to drive through the abolition of the current arrangements and replace them with a CLAF?
Yahoo: criminal legal aid No win, no fee to end? criminal legal aid fees
Google: criminal legal aid fees No win, no fee to end? criminal legal aid
Post your comment about:    No win, no fee to end?

   

Topics: Legal Advice Legal Aid Legal Aid Seniors
All Contents was collected by orders.If you have any problem please Click Me © 2008 Legal Helps Time 0.082437 S(s).Query 5.