|
No win, no fee to end?
Grieve admitted that the Conservatives had first permitted such arrangements, but said that Labour’s Access to Justice Act 1999, which replaced personal injury in legal aid with no win, no fee ‘seriously went off the rails’. In a response to a question from solicitor Simon Foster about what the Conservatives would do about NWNFA if elected, Grieve said, ‘If I could see a way of removing no-win, no-fee agreements and introducing a contingency fund I would do it. I believe no win, no fee is a flawed system which has a gentle corrupting influence on the legal profession’. In the last ten years there has been a large growth in personal injury cases funded in this way and to an extent they have succeeded in allowing many people who otherwise could not afford it to pursue their claims; but at a cost. Unregulated claims assessors were siphoning up to 20 per cent of a client’s compensation and there has been much complaint about shoddy work. The courts eventually ruled on the issue of the amounts the claims companies could charge and claims management regulation came into force in April 2007. While it would seem then that the problems with claims companies have been largely resolved, the point remains that lawyers have a stake in the outcome of cases, leaving many clients without representation as their cases have merit but are either too complex or too risky to take on. Clients also might be advised to take settlements as lawyers do not want to risk losing in court. Grieve’s solution is a contingent legal aid fund (CLAF) and this is supported by the Bar Council and Citizens Advice, among others. Such a fund would be paid for by charging application fees and taking a percentage from the winnings in successful cases. LAG has warned that such a system could not co-exist with NWNFA, as lawyers would cream off the better cases leaving those with less chance of success for the CLAF. It would seem Grieve believes this as well. The question is if he takes the reins of power next year at the Ministry of Justice does he have the determination to drive through the abolition of the current arrangements and replace them with a CLAF? Yahoo: criminal legal aid No win, no fee to end? criminal legal aid fees Google: criminal legal aid fees No win, no fee to end? criminal legal aid |
Related
Legal Aid Latest
›› Getting The Best From Your Lawyer
›› Carter Review Progress
›› Barristers Going On Strike
›› Reader Questions: Fees and Clients
›› Indigent Status Only Grants Relief from
›› Legal Fees: Flat fees vs. Hourly Rates
›› Legal aid? Probl sorted.
›› No win, no fee to end?
›› Criminal Aids Our Enies Again....
›› HIV/AIDS Legal Centre in Sydney, Austral
›› Criminal Transmission of HIV/AIDS: The L
›› The Criminal Legal Representation
›› Carter Review Progress
›› Barristers Going On Strike
›› Reader Questions: Fees and Clients
›› Indigent Status Only Grants Relief from
›› Legal Fees: Flat fees vs. Hourly Rates
›› Legal aid? Probl sorted.
›› No win, no fee to end?
›› Criminal Aids Our Enies Again....
›› HIV/AIDS Legal Centre in Sydney, Austral
›› Criminal Transmission of HIV/AIDS: The L
›› The Criminal Legal Representation
Legal Aid Popular
›› RPSC Legal Assistant Exam-2008
›› Carter Review Progress
›› 1L's: Want to Graduate Early?
›› 200 Years of Codification in Louisiana
›› Republican Aide Tries to Hire Hackers
›› No win, no fee to end?
›› Criminal Aids Our Enies Again....
›› The Criminal Legal Representation
›› Georgia-Pacific to Restart 2 Mississippi
›› Legal Fees: Flat fees vs. Hourly Rates
›› Getting The Best From Your Lawyer
›› Indigent Status Only Grants Relief from
›› Carter Review Progress
›› 1L's: Want to Graduate Early?
›› 200 Years of Codification in Louisiana
›› Republican Aide Tries to Hire Hackers
›› No win, no fee to end?
›› Criminal Aids Our Enies Again....
›› The Criminal Legal Representation
›› Georgia-Pacific to Restart 2 Mississippi
›› Legal Fees: Flat fees vs. Hourly Rates
›› Getting The Best From Your Lawyer
›› Indigent Status Only Grants Relief from
You may find: